2010-10-06, 04:22 PM
I have somewhat mixed views.
In one way I look at the $75 like insurgence: If you don't keep up with your payments and your house burns down you don't have anyone to blame but yourself. Though in a way that seem a little black and white. I mean according to the article and the video he was willing to pay them right then and there and at any point was willing to pay them "anything".
I suppose if i restrict it to purely looking at it like insurance payments i can see it from the conservative side.
But if he's right there saying he'll pay them... why let it burn down. Seems like a plantain move. I mean put it out and charge him the for the cumulative amount owed, if he doesn't pay you can take him to court. Really there's NO reason they shouldn't have put it out if you factor in the fact he said he would pay them. Hell they could have charged him a late fee and made more money off him.
I mean take a company like apple. Every couple of years you have to pay a payment to extend your coverage on your products (insurance). If you don't pay and you need help they charge you extra for the service. You still get the service but you're billed extra (way extra -_-). Even from a conservative standpoint what they did was bad business sense.
There's no promise they would know people where in there. Apparently their pets died.
(somewhat inappropriate side note: I lol'd at some of the people who bash nexon fpr them putting the business ahead of the people/customers in other parts of the forum but stand up for the firefighters over the now homeless man in this thread.)
In one way I look at the $75 like insurgence: If you don't keep up with your payments and your house burns down you don't have anyone to blame but yourself. Though in a way that seem a little black and white. I mean according to the article and the video he was willing to pay them right then and there and at any point was willing to pay them "anything".
I suppose if i restrict it to purely looking at it like insurance payments i can see it from the conservative side.
But if he's right there saying he'll pay them... why let it burn down. Seems like a plantain move. I mean put it out and charge him the for the cumulative amount owed, if he doesn't pay you can take him to court. Really there's NO reason they shouldn't have put it out if you factor in the fact he said he would pay them. Hell they could have charged him a late fee and made more money off him.
I mean take a company like apple. Every couple of years you have to pay a payment to extend your coverage on your products (insurance). If you don't pay and you need help they charge you extra for the service. You still get the service but you're billed extra (way extra -_-). Even from a conservative standpoint what they did was bad business sense.
Corn Wrote:If there was, then I'd bet the firefighters would've tried to save them. No one is REALLY THAT heartless.
There's no promise they would know people where in there. Apparently their pets died.
(somewhat inappropriate side note: I lol'd at some of the people who bash nexon fpr them putting the business ahead of the people/customers in other parts of the forum but stand up for the firefighters over the now homeless man in this thread.)