A metaphor to mull over

What I meant is that a devoutly religious person could use this argument to justify pushing their views on someone, claiming that they know their views to be "fact," not that it is dangerous TO religion, but dangerous when mixed WITH religion.

But the 'revolutionaries' were using facts to back themselves up, while faith/religion is, by definition, the belief in something without basing it on facts. :f6:

"belief that is not based on proof"
~Dictionary.com