Amendment 62: Raped teens must have babies

[color="red"]Hmm hmm...without religion involved, there is pretty much no reason to force the mother to keep it. I think the pro-life fanboys think that any woman given the chance would always abort, even though that's not really the case. If birth control was outlawed, and people continued having sex as much as they do, we would end up incredibly overpopulated after a short amount of time. The fetus won't feel anything anyway, and yes, it could be the next Bill Gates or Gandhi, but it could also be the next Hitler or hyperhopper (lulz). Maybe you'll kill the cure for cancer, maybe you'll prevent the end of human life on the planet.

-to be edited later, I need to leave class.[/color]

Uhm, what happened to the 35 amendments before 62. Or is this not to the constitution?

Uhm, what happened to the 35 amendments before 62. Or is this not to the constitution?

I believe this is a state amendment, not a constitutional one.

I believe this is a state amendment, not a constitutional one.

Yeah. I believe people need to stop making this so confusing. I tried looking up "Amendment 18" concerning funding for highway purposes for Washington state, and I got a bunch of ones about Prohibition from the US Constitution x_X

My views on abortion:
--Survival of the fittest. If I don't get "privileges" from society, so be it.
--I care about world overpopulation.

The "Yes on Amendment 62" article is lacking a lot of reasons why I should care for it, and instead spends its time defending itself. That's just silly.