2012-08-20, 12:55 AM
Kaasoljoyyx Wrote:As far as all champs unlocked for it, I see that bad as well as people will have no idea what to do if they get some random champ they've never played a single time e.g. Sejuani, karma, zilean, trundle, etc
its a good point, but it happens anyways with the free champs. especially when you have (a) teammate(s) with < 200 normal wins, because (assuming they arent a smurf and/or havent bought much rp) they just dont have the champ pool and mechanical experience you can expect from 500++ normals... and they have a relatively high chance of randoming something they cant play anyways.
allowing all champs to be unlocked eliminates owned champion stacking, gives newer players an opportunity to just try all champs instead of needing to wait for certain free champs for 15 rotations (AND allows them to always be able to ask a teammate to swap, which can be HUGE because a lot of players dont diversify their competent roles/champs until way later), and adds a further degree of separation for skill (in that knowing how to play AS _____ in arams gives you as much advantage as knowing how to play AGAINST ____ in normals)
idk, i buy champs now based on how they do in arams over buying them cuz i want them. i have all the champs i want... all the ranged ad and select few others that all have a
feel or sci fi theme. i have anivia for aram. zyra. galio. my next will be jayce. oughta get naut some time. i know how to play against every champ in a team fight, and how to lane against probably 90-99%. i know how to build almost all of them, and primary damage sources for everyone (to build against them). but i dont really want to master new champs in serious games and sacrifice several semi-serious games for learning when i could instead have fun doing it in arams. but thats just me. if they were all free id be focusing on rune pages instead which is arguably more important now anyways since i have all the champs i want for normals.