2011-11-27, 03:30 PM
tecul1 Wrote:You only listed one reason, and that reason is comparing buccs to another class o.0
Care to list more? And please don't do DPM comparisons, most buccs never even wanted to be top bossers anyway.
All in all, the reason why I made a brawler adv ring mule all that time ago was to experience a little of what buccs experienced (it was fun just extremely slow for my taste :/), so I kinda understand that changing the playstyle so dramatically is going to piss off a LOT of people, buccs being the majority, but some others (like me) as well.
It's like stripping arans of their combo system and buffing up their attacks to "supposedly" make up for it, or stripping WHs of their jaguar. It can work... but it just doesn't make sense.
Oh oh! Can I try one!
Stun mastery sucks because stun is an entirely worthless mechanic while bossing and a mostly worthless mechanic otherwise.
The reason it is worthless on bosses is because, as you may know, they are immune. The reason it is worthless outside of that, is because the best monsters to train on are typically immune to stun due to being GMS LHC, or parts of instanced play and immune. Those that aren't typically die too fast for stun mastery to make any sort of difference.
All in all, it's not a very good skill it should be changed or replaced. Hamad suggests a change that increases the damage the class deals and throws out the number 35%. Is it unreasonable that the class deals more damage? Even if he did it poorly I think he showed it clearly isn't. Did he specify how this increase in damage would be implemented or say it would happen any one particular way that is in some way flawed? I don't think so.
So what are you hung up on? The number he came up with? Seriously? It's that big of a deal?
You guys are so caught up in disagreeing with hamad you can't even admit stun mastery is a fail skill that needs to be changed or replaced.