Nexon: Can and Can't.

And we're all to conclude that just because a method is more cost-effective, a company should utilize that method, regardless of the effect on the end.

Then I'll again assume that you've never run a business yourself. In case you wonder (I'll whisper this! It's about making money!)

Yeah, I'm not surprised that you're going to just assume I don't understand you. It makes it a tad easier for you to presume your argument to be infallible.

Well, since you can't seem to read, judging is easy.

However, back in reality, a game modification doesn't have to alter the client-server interaction to qualify as modifying the code.

Remember your previous statement, "I'm pretty sure developing content involves altering the code. Questions?"

The whole post is regarding server/client modification on what they can and can't do. The whole argument is about why they can't fix server/client-related issues. Get me?

A TOS' existence does not in itself make it a bonding contract. There are several clauses within Nexon's TOS that would not hold up in a court of law.

http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/o...D0411P.pdf

Again, you must be new here.

No, not really.