2011-10-27, 04:01 PM
So its possible - and internally consistent - that Ganon could've been destroyed, never to return, twice in the existing Zelda chronology since there are two timelines. They'd have to be the "last" games in each of the timelines.
But this doesn't preclude Nintendo from making a game in the future that create the possibility of a third timeline which one of the existing games is said to follow chronologically. But yeah, he can only actually have been destroyed if he doesn't appear later in the chronology. Destroy is actually a stronger word than kill since they've already introduced the possibility of resurrection.
Also, stop dirtying Zelda by comparing it to the filth Nexon passes off as plot. It's made up at the last minute by an intern to make sure you keep buying NX.
But this doesn't preclude Nintendo from making a game in the future that create the possibility of a third timeline which one of the existing games is said to follow chronologically. But yeah, he can only actually have been destroyed if he doesn't appear later in the chronology. Destroy is actually a stronger word than kill since they've already introduced the possibility of resurrection.
Also, stop dirtying Zelda by comparing it to the filth Nexon passes off as plot. It's made up at the last minute by an intern to make sure you keep buying NX.