2011-04-30, 05:19 AM
Are you going to crosscheck all combinations so you can see the connections like you said in your first post? What you get now is "wow there's more people with a lv 40+ aran than DK's". Well duuh? I wanne know if people enjoyed playing a DK if they also like playing a jobX.
Or 160 people have a mechanic, and only 106 people enjoyed playing it. That is interesting information, but it doesn't explicitly show that only 66% of all people liked playing their mechanic, while 91% enjoyed their marksman.
40+ is much too low IMO, you should have added 80+ and 130+ too. That way there could be a "X% of the level 40 job Y were levelled to 70/120". And "X% of people enjoyed 70-130 and Y% enjoyed 130+" Because I for example enjoyed my BM till level 130 but after that I think they're aweful.
Anyways 328 people filling in a servey is pretty good and it shows some interesting graphs: Joined in which year is exponentially declining for example :O
You should make a "WHAT I LEARNED" and sum up all points like "blaze wizard is the rarest job", "MM gets highest enjoyed playing score" and so on
Or 160 people have a mechanic, and only 106 people enjoyed playing it. That is interesting information, but it doesn't explicitly show that only 66% of all people liked playing their mechanic, while 91% enjoyed their marksman.
40+ is much too low IMO, you should have added 80+ and 130+ too. That way there could be a "X% of the level 40 job Y were levelled to 70/120". And "X% of people enjoyed 70-130 and Y% enjoyed 130+" Because I for example enjoyed my BM till level 130 but after that I think they're aweful.
Anyways 328 people filling in a servey is pretty good and it shows some interesting graphs: Joined in which year is exponentially declining for example :O
You should make a "WHAT I LEARNED" and sum up all points like "blaze wizard is the rarest job", "MM gets highest enjoyed playing score" and so on