Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Court's ruling in funeral protest case restates First Amendment principles
#44
Back to the subject of how them being 1000 feet away is still an invasion of privacy:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/03/03/us.west...tml?hpt=C1

Quote:"When my son died, I knew two days ahead of time that they were coming," Snyder said. "I had other children that I had to worry about that didn't know what was going on."

"Because of (the protesters') presence, I had police coming out of the woodwork, I had sheriffs. I had a SWAT team. I had emergency vehicles. I had media coming in," Snyder said. "All I wanted to do was have a private dignified funeral for my son.

"They turned it into a three-ring circus," Snyder said.

If that's not clear and obvious intrusion, what is?
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Court's ruling in funeral protest case restates First Amendment principles - by Eos - 2011-03-04, 01:48 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)