2010-12-19, 02:58 PM
For everyone who doesn't bother reading Jamie's posts anymore, let me tl;dr her last wall of text for you:
1. She reiterates what Eos said earlier.
2. She discusses prejudice and ignorance related to emotions of diversity in the most grandiose, general scope possible, from which, of course, any conclusions drawn are irrelevant to the debate at hand as they don't address the specificity of DADT repeal. In other words, she is, yet again, trying to compare two different contexts, one that exists in an infinitesimally small corner of the other, in a way that is logically fallible.
Oye vey.
1. She reiterates what Eos said earlier.
2. She discusses prejudice and ignorance related to emotions of diversity in the most grandiose, general scope possible, from which, of course, any conclusions drawn are irrelevant to the debate at hand as they don't address the specificity of DADT repeal. In other words, she is, yet again, trying to compare two different contexts, one that exists in an infinitesimally small corner of the other, in a way that is logically fallible.
Oye vey.