Kalovale Wrote:Had there been no participation from merchants, there would only be 2 parties involved, much easier to track after and pass judgment on at any given time. The fact that it's a common phenomenon nurtures temptations, and thus promotes sales, or crime/offense commitment, so to put.
> Person A, B and C are well known for selling cheap Chaos Scrolls in bulk, something must be fishy and I have a bad feeling about this.
> Chaos Scrolls are being sold cheap in bulk all over the places, something is fishy but how the hell will the punishment reach me?
Regardless, no excuses change its nature of deliberating making use of a glitch for personal benefits.
Again i remind you that if merchants were not merchanting chaos they would be merchanting any and everything, the only people who personally benifited were the people who used the scrolls to upgrade items (who were not banned at all) and the actual hackers creating the scrolls. The thing that pisses the most people off is the inconsistancys in the enforcement. its OK to merch all items made by the summoning hacks but not the pitch hack? merchanting hacked items should be bannable or not bannable, not subjective.
Dustbunny the problem with your arguement is that its there are no forms of conterfit money that is legal to own. and there is no way for merchants to tell the difference between real and counterfit chaos. for example, i had 20 chaos for weeks befor this hack came out, but i got banned for having them and not participating in any way in this hacking or mechanting.
Kalovale yeah it would be easier, but lets not confuse nexon's lazyness for a banable offense.