BombsAway Wrote:Cheating isn't a life feature. It's a practice, an option, an idea, if you will.
Sorry but this argument isn't cutting it. Also, disregarding the fact that Nexon's word means less to me than my perpetually-thieving sister's, the fact that they aren't even close to being impartial (they benefit MASSIVELY from leechers) makes their stance on this subject pretty shady. Like AIG executives on bonuses.
Of course, Nexon is trying to earn money. But if you're stating that they're impartial because they earn money off leechers, then we can use the same argument against hacking. Which is quite wrong, I think. People can go around and hack, stating that "Nexon's word means less nothing to me, because Nexon loses money of hacking and is thus impartial". The argument is the same, is it not?
Edit: And for your reference, I am not for leeching, but I've accepted it. As Nexon has said that leeching is okay, I cannot counter it with any reasonable argument without including some sort of paradox or fallacy. As far as I know.
You could always state that in your opinion, leeching is illegal. But your opinion does not affect others, because the only "opinion" that matters are Nexon's rules whenever it comes to banning and not banning.
Edit2: If I recall correctly, AIG used money from their bailout on vacations and parties, correct? I'm not quite sure whether they had to sign some papers stating that they would have to use it on recovering the business or not, so I don't really have enough information (or know enough about the case) to say anything about it.