U.S. Military won't replace their M16's, despite its long history of problems?

I believe they had issues with the contract being too expensive compared to Colt's and supposed inconclusive testing.

Well, tests can get expensive, that's true to a certain extent.......

But I'd take anything for a better weapon. Hell, I'd prefer a weapon that doesn't act up in sh'itty conditions or have a low rate of jamming, like the experimental XM8.

M16/M4's have been made fun of for a while now simply because it can foul up easily in bad conditions as well as its high rate of jamming. I dunno, but they better get the M16 replaced within a decade or so; otherwise the U.S. military will be screwed, lol.