Lozmaster Wrote:Good job it isn't then.
Oh wait, you weren't kidding? You're trying to review a game based on a single e3 video from an early alpha/beta version of a game from 2 [or more] years ago. Yup. Thats the way the pros do it!
I have no clue what your first sentence means because the sentence structure wasn't thought out too well.
So on to the second comment-
First of all, don't abuse the happy faces, they didn't do anything to you, and it is unnecessary. Second, it wasn't an E3 video, but nice assumption.
No one said I was "Pro", so I really don't give a crap how these "pros" you speak of, "do it!".
Even if it was a E3 video, it would have been reliable. You do know what E3 is don't you?
And I'll call you out on being a hypocrite on this quote:
Quote:You're trying to review a game based on a single e3 video from an early alpha/beta version.....blah blah blahBecause you neither know what the game is like. And I wasn't doing a review, it was my own opinion from the sources I have seen. How can you review something that isn't even public yet? You can't.
If I reviewed it I would have said:
"Ya this game sucks 1/5 stars..."
Which is way different then stating an opinion like:
"This doesn't look as good as the online version."
And for the lulz-
Thanks for the...can I even call them comments?