Harrisonized Wrote:"All men are created equal" did not extend to women for a long time. In fact, more of American history has excluded women than it has included, based on this statement. It's not pomegranate linguistically though, if one says "all humans" are created equal.I am not talking about gay rights. I'm saying that unless gays were legitimately in love, they would not protest for their rights. Therefore, by that conclusion, the love between two homosexuals must legitimate.By extending you logic, we might as well not categorize between species of animals because dogs are dogs and cats are cats? Then we can further extend the concept by saying that we shouldn't distinguish between humans and apes because they're from the same evolutionary branch.Sorry for my accusatory terms, but that's the nature with which I speak.How about polygamy? In certain cultures where polygamy is allowed, would you call it cheating for a man to be married to two women?This I agree with.They fade because of habituation. This exists for all things, not just love. It exists for hate, anger, friendship, and a whole spectrum of emotions.While you can say that, the concept is still the same. It's an attraction to or dependence on the partner that one is with.
Can you please make your text in one block instead of answering sentence by sentence?
I already said I have nothing against gays, why would I start arguing with you on finer points of gay rights? It seems like you're trying to pick a fight, to be honest. X_x
My logic should not be "extended" to species of animals or whatnot, I said what I said and that's what I said. Please don't extrapolate like that becuase that's not my logic, that's you putting words in my mouth. African American means American blacks, who are NOT African, they have been in this country far longer than most white people, so they're American only. That is, they're like 7th generation American citizens. Whereas "true Africans" are immigrants and aren't considered African American. True Caucasians are a small group living in the Baltic region. The creation of such terminology is itself a complete moron-a-thon, and it misrepresents the groups it is supposed to represent.
Polygamy is created by men with power who want to fuuck more women than just their wives. I agree with the law in the United States which deems it illegal. As far as it being practiced in African tribes or something, I don't really see life as African tribesmen do, so comparing my logic with theirs seems a bit... well, illogical. We have different fundamental assumptions, so of course the logic will be different.
I will say "all humans are created equal" is much less powerful linguistically than "all men are created equal." Stirring high-quality content is never politically correct. I've been writing for ten years, I can tell you that 100%, but if you don't believe me on that, bring that up with any professor or teacher of English that deals in the classics. Postmodernists may argue otherwise, but I see postmodernism as the tubgirl of literature. Postmodernism meanders for 5 pages what could be said in 2 paragraphs. They claim to be able to "explain everything," but really they do so by taking all meaning out of their content, and replacing it with glib bullpomegranate. By the way name ONE successful politician that expressed his charisma through postmodernist language. Charismatic dialogue is always the type the Founders were using, because meandering through exceptions and inclusions in a speech will make it boring and devoid of charisma, which will make you fail at election season. If the true charismatics want to express themselves that way, and the people of America elect them, why should I be barred from using similar language in my personal life. What, am I inferior to them or something?
A 70 year old couple probably doesn't have sex very much. Their attraction is completely diffrent because at that point they are helping each other in life, which by their age is not really easy at all. Sexual attraction and this attraction are related but not the same. Hence the evolutional principle.