2014-12-04, 12:51 PM
Flonne Wrote:So wait, does that have to do with gawker specifically or just one retarded employee? I mean, they did post it on the website too, but is that gawker's fault? No question that the taper should be charged, they were taping stuff in "a private bedroom". Regardless of what was taped that's an offense, and doubly so because it was shared. Did gawker actually knowingly host it? I never saw the article in question.
From my understanding they are liable because they hosted the article even when knowing of this information. It be like Eos being punished for hosting child porn even though he himself didnt post it

