2014-10-14, 12:07 PM
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:I thought nobody cared about Zoe Quinn anymore though.
Gamergate doesn't care about Zoe Quinn anymore, Anti GG still does and use her as a scapegoat.
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:So how does being anti-GamerGate suddenly mean you're supporting her? I don't agree with the insanity of this thread? I guess Anita and Zoe are my girlfriends now!
'GAMERGATE IS A HATE MOVEMENT AGAINST ZOE BECAUSE OF HER GENDER, SAME WITH THESE TWO OTHER GIRLS, THEY WANT WOMEN OUT OF GAMING'.
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:Because here I'm reading two different things. Here I'm reading that GamerGate is both about journalism and about apparently showing people that they are "ass backwards"
Uh, you have anti gamergate harassing boogie, Gaymerx, intel, and anyone who doesn't agree with their ideology. They justify this crusade by the points stereo makes which is "gamergate is a hate movement, look at poor zoe Quinn!"
y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:I don't know, Chew. I thought this, as a forum, was about facilitating discussion, not attacking people and making a mockery of them.
I could give less of a pineapple if you think I'm stupid. I know I am. But attacking Stereo because their views don't align with your own? THAT'S ignorance to me.
And if you don't see that type of behavior as a campaign founded on hate, there's something fundamentally wrong.
How do you function? Go read stereo's first few posts, they were antagonistic and not for discussion, they were for belittlement, based on a planet size amount of fallacies. Asking why he supports morally bankrupt people is a very valid question, with a very disappointing answer unfortunately.

