2014-10-13, 10:30 AM
Stereo Wrote:See, I can believe Dustin is just in this argument because it's how he rolls, but some of you guys don't seem to realize the harm you're doing by supporting such a toxic movement. So... same?
Feminist's acting like marxists is much worse when they try to inject an ideology relentlessly because they were in sh`itty raised households and feel that the entire world is like that.
FYI the most prominent and active in the gamergate movement are all females, who are constantly harassed, told their opinion doesn't matter, that they are just guys pretending. There is nothing toxic about this movement, like, at all. Our consumer right allows us to tell companies what kind of harassment we go through, and intel was not the only company to see this. Even when gaymerx pulled out saying they don't support either side, gamergate didn't attack them for it. When boogie picked a neutral stance, gamergate majority supported him and continue to do so.
Anita Sarkeeson and Zoe Quinn are probably the worst things that have happened to the gaming community in a long time. They are professional pan handlers who victimize themselves as a job, has nothing to do with their gender. The fact journalists slander anyone who doesn't agree with their ideology and even attacked their readerbase as a whole, is enough for them to lose their jobs, their agenda is not in their job description, their "shadow of mordor kiss of death", is a classic example of exaggerated click bait.
If gamergate is a harassment movement, then go find me 5 people who havent been debunked who have got harassed to the toxic level of degree you mention, and I want solid proof not just what an article speculates. Then I will match you, I will show you that the so called people who did those things are doing it on both sides to cause wildfire. I will show you that gamergate people have been doxxed 10x worse, they've had actual threats from this feminist cult, they aren't even feminist to be honest, more marxist.
Your entire argument is baseless statements that I'm used to seeing on twitter, gamergate activists try to reason when this, only by the end of the conversation are told they don't care enough to actually look at the facts. You are perpetuating a fallacy and enabling this behavior by using this female meat shield to genuinely awful people. And by awful I mean someone who makes a game about depression, creates a false incident to gain attention by smearing those who are genuinely depressed. Though it says a lot how useless she is when all she can do is a boring text based game, how the hell did that win the indie game awards, oh right, conflict of interest.

