#Gamergate

Gamergate is a campaign to push the agenda of not pushing the feminist agenda because they don't want their agenda pushed on them. ????????????????????????????

*The people who are writing the articles aren't even a part of the mailing list*
When a large number of articles on the same topic are released, it's because *other people want to add their opinion to the topic as well* It's writing. It's journalism. It's what people do.
But you know, as long as Milo, proud member of 4chan declares the conspiracy to be so, it must be true!

The email list is basically a forum for discussion. To say that everyone in the email list is working together to systematically dismantle your hobby is insanity.

Southperry is a forum for a pineappleing dying MMO and people can't even agree on a topic in a shenanigans thread. Why in the 9 hells would people think that this email list could pull off some global conspiracy?

Let's look at the emails that Milo "exposed," shall we?

 Spoiler

Some people don't think harassment is okay. How dare they. Such collusion.

Jason Schreier, a senior writer at Kotaku, can be seen defending Nathan Grayson, the journalist who admitted to beginning a sexual relationship with Zoe Quinn just days after he mentioned her in his reporting and linking to her game, Depression Quest.

 Spoiler

Someone points out an obvious fallacy that was almost entirely the basis for the "conspiracy." He's obviously in cahoots with the journalist.
And the people who are still shouting collusion because he mentioned her name in an article prominently about her involvement in the ruin of game jam, and in an article about the popular greenlit games at the time, lol. The grasping at straws is real.

 Spoiler

One person gives his input on the matter (which is even prefaced with a "this is just my opinion here). But you know, one person giving an opinion is obviously proof of how they all operate with the same mindset.

And, the "big one":

 Spoiler

First sentence: 'if you share the opinion that people shouldn't be harassed'
I would hope that one speaks for itself how that can't be used as evidence of collusion.
And the rest of it is *one person's* take on the situation and how they suggest the situation be handled. Notice how there's no responses to this. Notice how there aren't any emails about how people are agreeing to write articles en masse about the subject. In fact, the *few* emails he leaked say NOT to say anything about the subject because it'll just propagate peoples' delusions.

http://ask.fm/ScottNichols/answer/118859079356

And I apologize if I'm not able to accurately gauge what the "goal" of gamergate is when it seems like everyone has a different idea of what gamergate is about because it changes its face every 5 seconds when ideas are debunked.