2014-09-11, 05:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 2014-09-11, 08:10 PM by ChickenKiev.)
Flonne Wrote:
for pineapple's sake, are ANY of these people legitimate? Couldn't charity fraud get her even more time than Phil Fish is looking at? Every last one of these people need to be purged with fire.
https://twitter.com/FartToContinue/statu...9997776897 -- Zoe is trying to cover her tracks.
https://twitter.com/FartToContinue/statu...3360242688 -- Zoe is failing at covering her tracks.
Here's a video record so no one can claim that the above were altered: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6oGThc0kiw
[MENTION=69]Lozmaster[/MENTION]: Apparently, there are laws for that in the US (http://www.causemarketingforum.com/site/...ct=8951489) right here.
Quote:Requirements for Commercial Co-venturers. The CCV laws are triggered by representation made to the public -- i.e., advertising that a purchase will benefit a charitable organization or purpose. As with most regulation of advertising, local laws apply in each state where the offer is made to the public. Nationwide cause-related marketing campaigns therefore must comply with the laws in all 50 states.[7]
The basic requirements are as follows:
Written contract with the charitable organization. Approximately 20 states require a contract. Some specify certain provisions for the contract. A partial list of such provisions includes: accurate description of the offer to be made to the public, the charity’s right to an accounting of the program results, termination rights for the charity, citation to the state’s laws, an estimate of the total donation, and signature by two officers of the charity.
In other news, here's Anita Sarkeesian's claim of calling the police being called into question: https://twitter.com/Nero/status/510206980594860034
Video of conversation with SFPD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaXDLpjG...e=youtu.be


![[Image: qql8Onu.png]](http://i.imgur.com/qql8Onu.png)