2014-09-02, 08:20 PM
Niernen Wrote:So far it looks like Luv and Meow became suspicious from the whole no lynch things. Meow dropped it fast when people became suspicious, but its probably that either side would do that. Luv's reasoning for lynching mewo wasn't that great, but lynching someone that wants a no lynch is a valid strategy.
ChaoticCJ has only spoken to defend himself, and Thebirds has only posted flavor. Seeing how thebirds always gets away with being silent, [Vote] Thebirds. I'll remove it if they speak up more (not just flavor, they usually have some good points or insights), or something else changes.
The only problem with this theory for Luv is that Luv didn't vote for meowmixx because meowmixx was doing a No Lynch. He voted for meowmixx exclusively under the pretense of inactivity. Meowmixx later voted for a no lynch.
TheBirds is infamous for being inactive...but I must agree. We shouldn't let them do it again this game. I don't know why we let him get away with it every game (although, to be fair, I was dead by Day 3 last game, so I couldn't do anything about it). That being said I'm still not a big fan of an inactivity Day 1 lynch, but I'm not really sure what else to do. The only person I'm suspicious of for a reason other than inactivity is Luv right now, and I must admit that could have just been an honest mistake. Then again I bought it last game and it bit us in the ass. Then again again, meta-gaming 2 stronk.
LuvDWayULie Wrote:So, again, I'm suspicious for being different from the others. Oh well.
No, you're suspicious for making a bad vote and poorly backing it up. We've all done it before.