Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
We (And Nexon) will henceforth be prosecuting for ban evasion...
#20
Fiel Wrote:Is that a hosts file edit...? Because...


Never really dealt with rDNS
[/quote]

You didn't -x

Code:
dig -x  198.96.94.120

; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.6 <<>> -x 198.96.94.120
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 55604
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;120.94.96.198.in-addr.arpa.    IN      PTR

;; ANSWER SECTION:
120.94.96.198.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN    PTR     eosian-enterprises.com.

and since you already had the IP address you basically didn't ask it anything.

Fiel Wrote:Never really dealt with rDNS

It stopped being optional when larger email services like yahoo started bouncing you if your ip didn't reverse. Now it's even more complex because you not only have to reverse, you have do reverse to something covered by the approval in the spf.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
We (And Nexon) will henceforth be prosecuting for ban evasion... - by Eos - 2013-08-21, 04:46 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)