2013-05-31, 07:59 AM
valhala556 Wrote:what kind of games are we talking able. The term Gamer or statics on number of players who pay games can be easy skewed if you count social games. Strictly social games should be excluded because they dont have any story and rarely portray anything human like.
Drawing the line on "What is a gamer" at anything other than "a person who plays videogames", which yes, will include social games, is skewing the data. Whether you like it or not, the people playing farmville or whatever the big facebook game is now are gamers too.
If you draw the line at "not having any story", then you have to discount other things too. For instance, New Super Mario brothers Wii/Wii u could have its entire "story" summarized in a single sentence. Clearly that would be a silly thing to do.
Quote: How will she convert people into accepting her idea if people cant take the time to challenge her's to see if her's is better than the one individuals already created.Because she doesn't care for converting people. That isn't what she wants. What she wants is for females/feminists to be dominant, and that her way of thinking is "right" whether or not you actually agree.
Also, it virtually impossible to convert people to your way of thinking (especially on something as controversial as this) through the internet, especially not the people who would be commenting on the videos. So I can imagine why she wouldn't be trying.