Catholic Hospital Says Fetus Isn't Human Life

Didn't see anything relevant other than bashing the Catholic Church for being hypocritical and flip-flopping on a law that they've been working to defeat. Nothing of relevance in a legal case.

The response was towards the entity of the entire post, as it was regarding the legality of the case.

And if we're going off of experience based off of association and talking to tax lawyers (the reality: similar jargon, different execution), then I'd be just as experienced given the fact that I've taken two classes on American law with both of my professors being in the legal profession (one a Supreme Court judge in Missouri). I'm still in regular contact with these people. I've also sat in on numerous court martials as well.

It's not association, my job is essentially enforcing and defining more than 8 different type of tax codes in my state. Although IFTA could be considered internationally (internationl fuel trade agreement). Your terrible attention to detail kind of destroys any form of credibility of either your claims or your teachers. Just sayin.

Just because you talk with them, doesn't mean you have actual experience. Theory is one thing and execution is another.

Sorry, I was under the assumption that you knew what my job was as I was vocal about it for months. I deal with almost every type of tax/state legislature in my state. I don't directly write the laws, but I do directly enforce them, which means understanding them.

Same place where you found it, different interpretations.

Talking out of your ass to save face I see. I copied and pasted the entire definition you tried to throw in my face. There's no interpretation, you're wrong, its clearly stated and there's no ambiguous vocabulary to deter to any alternative. You either misread it or simply don't understand it.

Facts and circumstances is everything in law, which you should know from all your talks with tax lawyers. From my research, all I've found was a blocked artery. It's hard to say whether or not that blocked artery can be attributed to stress, bad luck, or bad life habits. There's not really enough information out there to determine whether or not you can attribute the pregnancy playing a role (or at least for a judge) in any way to her death.

Didn't watch the full extent of the video. Also, the same article used by TYT uses malpractice and wrongful death (manslaughter) interchangeably. The description of the video uses wrongful death and then within the first ten seconds of the video, the anchor uses malpractice. It's a mere distinction, hence why I didn't correct it.

But real actual last post this time. im srs. supa srs.

Are you f`ucking serious?! You're trying to fall back on the possibility that her pregnancy caused a clogged artery thus heart failure? I would love for you to find me an example of that, but I'm no doctor. Although your elementary definition of how "law" work's was kind of cute considering you can't actually hold a relevant argument case and point;

From my research, all I've found was a blocked artery. It's hard to say whether or not that blocked artery can be attributed to stress, bad luck, or bad life habits. There's not really enough information out there to determine whether or not you can attribute the pregnancy playing a role (or at least for a judge) in any way to her death.

Why is this relevant? The malpractice is not anywhere associated with why the mother died, it's the lack of action the doctors took. Under the fathers consent they should have done what he asked. Again I'm no doctor, but I'm pretty sure, especially if the f`ucking mother is dead, they have an obligation, legally to take his request, unless, because I know you'll point this irrelevant point out, it puts the patient in danger. The person was dead, attempting to save those kids brought no harm to anyone, period. It was corner cutting and that's it, otherwise the catholic hospital would give us a real excuse rather than 'oh...according to the state law, which we want to change...we shouldn't be convicted!".