2013-01-09, 10:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 2013-01-09, 01:08 PM by Polantaris.)
Words Wrote:Polantaris also defended Zelkova. Why aren't you suspicious of him? He also never changed his Corn vote, and he posted after Corn's claim.
My apologies for being asleep preparing for work/at work after my vote. Real life comes first.
That being said, I must:
His reasonings for voting Zelkova just don't add up. I don't mean to constantly be on Zelkova's side, but Afeared has given no valid reasoning for his votes other than "Just because," which is beyond suspicious. His other reason wasn't exactly the most convincing argument either. He claims that this run should have no influences based on the previous run, however we can learn a lot by studying the previous game, like the fact that Zelkova claimed to be the nice guy, no one believed him, he was lynched, and the result was that you lynched the good guy.
Don't get me wrong, I'm suspicious of Zelkova, but Afeared currently outranks him with his bad responses, and I simply do not have enough evidence on Zelkova to vote against him at this time. But Afeared...I feel like I do.