2013-01-08, 01:25 AM
HIM:
I have not been conned. I know his backing. So, you will not accept his interpretation of the facts, but accept the other? Why? WHo would be conned, really? I also am aware of his biases, but find him more convincing based on the criteria he chose. Which would you choose? Mine (Allen's?) or the other?
I have not been conned. I know his backing. So, you will not accept his interpretation of the facts, but accept the other? Why? WHo would be conned, really? I also am aware of his biases, but find him more convincing based on the criteria he chose. Which would you choose? Mine (Allen's?) or the other?