Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is this troll science wrong?
#41
MagicsBISH Wrote:Its possible, just to expensive!

No.

C0SA Wrote:Yep... and what's the problem?

There isn't a problem, but if you already knew that then you should realize you really didn't add anything to the topic.
Reply
#42
1. I'm pretty sure there are other elements worth more then platinum, like most early transuranic elements
2. The energy required to achieve platinum from gold far exceeds the gross profit
Nuclear options:
Undergoing beta decay from neutron-rich iridium
Undergoing alpha decay from proton-rich mercury
Reply
#43
HybridStigmata Wrote:1. I'm pretty sure there are other elements worth more then platinum, like most early transuranic elements
2. The energy required to achieve platinum from gold far exceeds the gross profit
Nuclear options:
Undergoing beta decay from neutron-rich iridium
Undergoing alpha decay from proton-rich mercury

Worth more maybe. Just not as commercially viable.
Reply
#44
I think it's wrong because it's element number 78 and 79 they both have stable nuclei. Therefore, they can't go into a decay mode and turn to something else. o.o
Reply
#45
FallenStar Wrote:I think it's wrong because it's element number 78 and 79 they both have stable nuclei. Therefore, they can't go into a decay mode and turn to something else. o.o

This has already been answered. And that isn't why.
Reply
#46
octopusprime Wrote:This has already been answered. And that isn't why.

My bad =S
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)